Showing posts with label When I am King. Show all posts
Showing posts with label When I am King. Show all posts

9/22/2014

When I am King: I'll Sell My Books on *All* the Online Stores!

After much gashing of teeth and dorking around with HTML, XML, CSS, ePub editors, validators, and many other pieces of arcane technology that I'd love to not have to know about, I finally managed to convert both of my comedy books into a form that's digestible by the Google Play Store.

This means that both books are not available on the Play Store. Better yet, I've made them totally reasonably-priced at just $1.99 each. Because I'm such a reasonable guy and all.

The books were already available in dead-tree format and for Kindle. And When I am King... II was already on the Play Store... but only in 'scanned' (PDF) format. The new twist now is that both books are also available in an e-reader friendly format (ePub) from the Play Store. For just $1.99. (Did I mention that already?)




When I am King...

When I am King... this book will be required reading. Until then, consider it important background reading on future social policy. And an excellent beer coaster.




When I am King... II

More Reasons to Put Me in Charge

Health. Politics. Parenting. Education. Coffee. Bamboo: serious issues that plague each of us every day. But aren’t we all too busy to deal with these them? Wouldn’t we like a friendly monarch to take over and solve all of these problems for us?

Kingship: It’s not just for princes anymore!

5/18/2014

When I am King: Driver's Seat



When I am King...

Dating couples will take each other for a test drive.

When you're auditioning future mates, it's important to know how things will pan out in the long run. There are obvious elements to consider such as food preferences, body hygiene, and likelihood that they'd be a serial-killer. But by far the most important factor in relationships is how compatible you will be in the cars that you will share.

Will they shift the seat way up and tilt it so far forward that they can drive with their chest? Will they lean it back so far that they could take a nap in traffic? Will they boost the height and make you scrape your head when you try to cram yourself into the car?

None of these things seat settings are permanent, obviously; that's why they make them adjustable. But all of them take time to readjust every time you get into the car.

Every. Single. Time.

Take just one of those times and multiply it by several times a day for the length of a marriage. Suddenly a minor annoyance that's fixed in a minute became a needless waste of hours or days per year. Think about the various hobbies that you never have time for, or the novel that you never get around to starting because you don't have the time in your life; this is where that time went. Your partner stole that time by their relentless insistence that your car seat fit their body.

According to the Bureau of Tedious and Made-up Statistics (BTMS), most marriages last far less than the lease on your car. So maybe you're thinking that this doesn't seem too terrible, and that they're really cute. But cuteness erodes like the skyline view from your condo that got obscured by the new office block across the street. And the hassle of repositioning your car seat never gets easier. I would argue that, in fact, most marriages implode early due to this one single painful dynamic; none of us wants to waste our time on our comfort level, we just want it the way we always had it, before that other person came into our lives and just messed everything up.

So do yourself a favor: put your partner in the driver's seat and see what they do there. And if they change things around, leave them there.

3/09/2014

When I am King: Mug Shot



When I am King...

Muggings will be more frequent and more appreciated.

I’ve never been mugged, but mugging seems like a really good deal.

Think about it: someone is offering you a service (not beating you up) in exchange for whatever money you have on you. Unless you’re carrying a huge stash from a recent bank heist, that’s a pretty good deal. The recovery time alone, on top of possible doctor’s visits and downtime, is well worth the few bucks in your wallet. And if you add the actual pain involved in the procedure, it’s worth that much more.

My favorite part about mugging is that it’s a fair system based on the enlightened principle of pay-what-you-can. Instead of the rather heartless capitalist mechanism of charging whatever the market will bear and expecting everyone to pay that price, the average victim is, instead, charged only what he or she has on them at the time, which is imminently more sensible and kind. If I were charged the real price for not getting the crap kicked out of me, it could cost thousands of dollars. As it is, I can walk around the dark places in the city confidently, knowing that I will only owe the twenty bucks that I happen to have in my wallet.

Compare this deal to the price of dinner or a movie, and I think you’ll see that it’s an urban experience that's well worth the price.

Of course, the mugger could always choose to hurt you even after you’ve given them your money. But that’s just not fair and I wouldn’t stand for it (I would choose, instead, to lie in the gutter moaning and bleeding softly).

In future installments, I’ll analyze the financial benefits of being sued, getting divorced, and being jailed for life.

1/12/2014

When I am King: What's in a Name?



When I am King...

The name Chet will be used by more interesting movie characters.

It is the bane of my life to have the name Chet. I could have had a clever name, or a tough-guy name, or a unique name. But instead, due (if I understood the story correctly) to the massive amount of epidural drugs rocketing around my mother’s system when she was still recovering from what I did to her, I was given what everyone assumes is a nickname. Everyone I know eventually asks me, “What’s your real name?” and I can see the pity in their eyes when I reveal that I have nothing more to offer. Worse, it’s a name that is not unique, but is extremely uncommon because it’s, well, dorky.

I’ve met a total of three other Chets in my entire life. One of those was the guy I inherited the name from, so he doesn’t count. (I asked if I could give him the name back; apparently that wasn't polite). And none of those people, including my relative, actually had the name Chet, they just shortened their name to that nickname from the arguably dorkier name Chester, from which Chet is typically derived. Chester is not, I’d like to remind you, my real name. I just have Chet. Just a nickname. Just a dorky nickname based on a dorky real name.

At this point, many motivated children will turn to their backup plan: the middle name. This is, after all, why we have them - why else would we have a name that sits in the middle of the other two, never getting used except when applying for a drivers license or being yelled at by your parents? It’s the slient-p of the naming world. It’s the color ‘transparent’. It’s the Prophet Elijah that always gets a place to sit but never gets to come to the table. The frustrated and poorly-named child will whip that name out and start using it willy-nilly, producing such awesome names as F. Scott Fitzgerald.

So I turned to my middle name and found only Spencer, which, at my current age, doesn’t seem too bad. But to a twelve year old with glasses, that’s not much of an improvement. That’s like putting a “Punch me, jerk!” sign on your nose and then poking the bully next to you with your sharpened #2 pencil. So I stuck with Chet. At least I had the advantage that nobody gave me a nickname, since they thought I already had one.

For a time, I was in a phase where I would tell people that Chet was short for Hatchet Killer. In fact, I'm still in that phase.

Part of the reason that people actually know the name, despite nobody they know actually having the name (or admitting to it) is that books and Hollywood keep it alive. That’s right - I have a character name. When Hollywood wants a character with a strong stereotype personality, Chet is one of the first names they consider.

Apart from one oddball use of the name in a mystery novel (I believe it was the excellent Carl Hiaasen mystery novel Double Whammy), in which there was a redneck character named Chet, nearly all of the Hollywood uses of the name boil down to this: uptight oddball.
The Hardy Boys: The kid-detective's dorky, overweight, uptight friend was named Chet. Great.
Weird Science: Apparently I’m also an uptight military-school character.
Fargo: Chet was the doorman for the sleazy hotel where the author stayed.
Bay Boys: Once again, there was a doorman named Chet. Apparently it’s the only job Chets can get in that town.

There are other examples, but that’s the general trend. Uptight oddball, with a little bit of redneck mixed in.

Then I saw Turbo this weekend with the kids. And there’s a Chet in it. And you’ll never guess the character he plays. Ah, you guessed it - it’s the uptight, flaccid, and totally dull brother.

But here’s the disturbing part: As soon as the character (played by Paul Giamatti) started speaking, my whole family decided that it actually was me. Negative, sarcastic, and (I suppose) purple: I’m all of those things. So maybe Hollywood’s had it right all of this time. Or maybe I’m just playing the part really well. Because Turbo nailed it: I am that purple shelled, bad-attitude mollusk.

When I am King, Hollywood will change the rules and start using Chet as the name for action heroes and leading roles of all kinds. No more dorky sidekicks: we’ll have the big stars as our role models: tall, strong, … and probably still dorky, because they got stuck with the name Chet.

What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
Except Chet. Don't name that flower Chet.

8/13/2013

When I am King: Tattle Tale



When I am King...

Tattoos will be more realistic.

I spent the day at a waterpark, which wasn’t so much about body surfing as it was about body art. There were tattoos everywhere. I haven’t seen so much ink since my daughter figured out that felt-tip pens work really well on walls and furniture.

You can say that I’m not a hipster (No, really: say that I’m not a hipster. Please.). But I spent far too much of my Navy-brat childhood looking at sailor tattoos that probably used to look good years ago (at least before the sailor passed out in the tattoo parlor and woke up the next morning).

That delicate and beautiful dragon you've just covered your torso in will one day look like a butterfly drawn by a drunk toddler. In bile.

These things just don’t age well. You can tell me about the artistry (No, really: Don’t tell me about the artistry. Please). You can say that the technology is better now. You can say it’s a living art piece, whose changes you’ll always appreciate. But when your skin sags, or the surgery sews things shut in just the wrong way, or when those beautiful dark greens fade to the color of 1950s dinnerware, you might start wearing shirts again. And pants. And maybe body casts. Because that shit isn’t ever going to look better.

When I am King, tattoos will be drawn realistically. First, the artist will take a green Sharpie pen (the large-tipped one, the one that puts a stain on your dining room table that you’ll never stop noticing. That one). Then the tip will be mashed so that the felt is shattered and splayed out in several directions. Then the original, detailed design will be drawn with that pen onto your skin while the artist is blindfolded. And high. And suspended upside-down. You will then wear that design for a week and, if you still want it, you will be allowed to get that tattoo permanently (inked into the exact shape created by the mashed Sharpie, of course).

If you want something to remember, take a picture. If you want something to regret, get a tattoo.

8/10/2013

When I am King: Now Available for Android



When I am King...

I'll make my books available on the Google Play Store.

After a long delay and many weekends wasted fighting with my word processing program (A pox on you, Word!), I've managed to make my latest comedy book, When I am King... II: More Reasons to Put Me in Charge, available for purchase on the Google Play Store.

Better yet, I'm offering it at a steep discount relative to both the hardcopy ($6.95) and Kindle ($3.49) versions. For a limited time only (maybe), the book is available on the Play Store for just $1.99 (or whatever that translates to in your country or on your planet. I think it's worth 3 pigs in some South Pacific island nations).

This means that you can purchase the book for reading on any Android device, or in Chrome, or wherever Google books can be consumed.

For now, only the PDF version is available (that's what "Scanned pages" means on the Google Play page for the book). I'd like to say that this is because I worked so hard on the format of the original book that changing it would be an insult to the original typesetting, and that the book is best enjoyed in its original, intended format. I'll admit, instead, that Microsoft Word is so horrible at saving out HTML (who knew?) that the conversion to ePub has thus far defeated me.

On the plus side, the book actually does look quite good in PDF on large enough devices. That is, if your screen is large enough that you can read it without having to zoom in, it's a good reading experience. This means that it's great on tablets (7", like the Nexus 7, as well as larger models like the 10" Nexus 10), not so great on phones.

I will keep attacking Word and trying to get an ePub version out there. If I succeed, anyone that bought the original PDF version will also get the new ePub version. Wish me luck.

I'll also work on converting the original, classic book When I am King.... All I have to do is track down the original file. And fight with Word some more. I'm thinking of writing my next book with charcoal on parchment paper; I think that will be easier to convert to electronic versions than any book written in Word.

3/10/2013

When I am King: Poperrific



When I am King...

I’ll be Pope, too.

It occurred to me that the conclave is happening this next week. The conclave. No, not opposite of convex, the papal conclave; the event that happens every time a Pope dies (usually), when it’s time to elect a new Pope. Only this time, it’s happening without a dead pope, instead there's just a lazy pope that quit mid-term. (Sorry, I don’t know why he quit. Maybe he’s considering running for President and got offered a job with Fox News in the interim.)

It doesn’t matter why he quit. What does matter is that it is time to elect a Pope. Which is huge.

In our modern world, with such modern concepts as Representative Democracy and Parliamentary Democracy of some nations, along with the model spoused by countries such as Iran and North Korea of Complete Lunatic Dictatorship, the Papacy (uncomfortably close to the phrase “Pap Smear”) is as close to a monarchy as we get these days. Sure, there are actual monarchies in countries like Englandthe United Kingdom, but let’s face it; those kings and queens gave up their true power long ago for the luxury of keeping their heads attached to their necks. The closest they get to actually ruling is deciding what king of marmalade to have on their morning toast.

I’ve decided that being Pope is as close to a being King as this world offers. And that particular kingship is up for grabs. All it takes is one single election result and I'm in. Sure, it's a long shot, especially since I'm not actually a Cardinal, I haven't been nominated, I'm not Catholic (or Christian… or even religious), and I don't happen to be in Rome this week. But even so, this election represents the best chance yet I have at being elected King.

A word on the papal conclave: Some consider this process to be the epitome of democracy. In a normal governmental election, everyone votes once, the votes are tallied, and the winner is announced. In some more advanced societies, the winner is actually determined by an "electoral college", which bears as much resemblance to "college" as senior home bingo game does to a frat party. This extra twist on elections allows country to place less emphasis on how many people voted for each candidate and more on where those people are from. The reasoning for this goes along with other geography-based determinants in our society, like where you go to school, where you take your date to dinner, and where your alibi places you when the cops call.

The papal conclave, however, takes democracy a step further, enabling the participants to vote not once, not twice, but as many times as they want to until they're happy with the result. Imagine how great our other democracies would be if we could simply keep voting until the losing side got tired and went to bed. All we need is for the voting public to be at least 85 years old and too damn old and tired to care, which is the fundamental nature of the conclave and the cardinalship in general.

The other crucial element of the conclave is the announcement of the result. In other modern societies, we watch the news feed which helpfully informs us of early polling results so that we can decide whether it's worth the bother of driving 5 minutes to the polling station. If our candidate of choice is losing badly, it's probably better to just stay in the chair and have another six pack. This ensures that the people in our society that have the most impact on elections are those on the eastern side of the country in later time zones, and those that vote early in the morning. This approach ensures a fair and equal election, effectively wiping out the drunk vote of those that get hammered in the evening and decide not to risk a DUI ticket for the slim chance that their vote would count. Early morning drunks are, of course, still a factor in the electoral process. But fortunately our voting systems depend on complex motor skills such as poking holes in papers and drawing straight lines, which tends to weed out the hopelessly inebriated from the count.

The conclave, on the other hand, depends on the classic system of Indian Smoke Signals, notifying the world not what the early results are, but rather just a yes/no result of whether there are results. This is akin to news stations posting bulletins that "Elections are still being held today," which would be incredibly helpful, given how little most of us care and how likely we are to keep forgetting.

Black smoke indicates that the voting continues and that a Pope has not yet been chosen. White smoke indicates that the election is complete and that there is a new Pope, or that the ribs are done and most of the fat has burned off. Colored smoke is a sign that on of the cardinals is just screwing with us.

Once the new Pope has been chosen, there is elaborate ceremony, including a parade down Broadway, with block-sized blowup dolls of popes throughout history, and confetti made from shredded communion wafers, allowing the entire city to take communion together, possibly the only interesting thing to have happened at a parade since the mistake of letting the Hindenburg lead the Macy's Day parade in 1937.

These are all of the elements surrounding a papal election, but the internal details of the election itself are covered in a mysterious shroud, maybe one with smudges that vaguely resemble a face. It is this secretive element of the process that makes me so hopeful; if nobody knows how it's actually working, who's to say that my name couldn't be tossed into that tall, pointy hat?

All I ask is that the Cardinals carefully consider my nomination. And that they also consider the large monetary kickback that I'd freely donate to them from the overflowing coffers of the Vatican, because I'd definitely be willing to pay my way in. After all, the election of a Pope doesn't happen every year; I'd better take advantage of this opportunity rather than spend the next several years regretting and waiting for the next Pope to die or quit.

All I need now is the nomination to achieve critical mass.

1/16/2013

When I am King: Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow



When I am King...

We’ll all be bald.

It was time, once again, to cut my hair. I know when my hair starts looking dumb that the time is upon me. But when co-workers start making fun of it, it’s past time and something has to happen. Soon.

Don't get me wrong: I like long hair, or at least I like the idea of it. I like letting hair grow out because we just don’t feel like cutting it, having a more casual image that doesn’t need to conform to some uptight standard of close-cropped follicles, letting it whip around in the breeze as you ride around in your devil-may-care jeep (which always sounds good, then you get a nice fat lock snapping you in the eyeball and it's a little less wonderful). Plus, you can use the loose ends of your long hair as a spare napkin or dust mop.

But the reality is that my hair looks awful when it gets long. It doesn’t even look good at medium length. In fact, it looks best when it’s hardly there at all.

My parents have never told me the true story of my origins, but I suspect that my hair is a result of the unholy union of a Chia Pet and a Brillo Pad. It is at once an impermeable substance, built to withstand great stress and provide powerful scrubbing ability, and a miracle plant which defies gravity by growing straight out in the direction it points. Meanwhile, the individual strands of hair are inorganic materials, giving my mop the absorbency of a box of nails. I can get out of a pool with hair that is just as dry as it was before I got in. If it weren’t for the rust stains my hair leaves as it dries, I wouldn’t need a towel at all.

The combination of these factors gives me a topping that is less like a head of hair and more like a porcupine on high alert, except not quite as cuddly.

When it is short, it’s fine; it just sits there, biding its time and plotting its evil hair plots. I can tell what it’s thinking, but it can’t do anything about it yet.

When the hair is at medium length, it has grown out in all directions and is untamable by comb, brush, or flame thrower. It is an impenetrable mass of steel bristles, shaped only by its own whims and my awkward sleeping positions at night. It is a helmet of yuck, a dollop of ridiculousness, a statement to everyone around me that I had a bad night last night, even when it is now the next evening and the hair has looked like that all day.

I remember watching Dune, years ago. I enjoyed it not because of the way it fantastically captured the essence of the book (it didn’t), not because of its great acting (it had none, although I did enjoy Sting as a nut case), and certainly not because of the main character’s incessant and annoying whispering narration (“Father - She Sleeper has Awoken!”). No, I liked it because the main guy had a hair helmet like mine. I could tell that he was one sleepless night away from total hair anarchy, and that only the wizards of Hollywood were able to keep that ball of shame in check. And it gave me hope that there might be a place in this world for me and my dumb hair, even if it was just in bad 80s sci-fi flicks.

But alas, the movie bombed and I don’t remember seeing that actor or his dumb coif again. There was no renaissance of poofy hair styles, no viral uptake on that casserole of immovable mess. There was just a failed film and an actor looking for work and a better hairstyle.

So I continue my strategy of Cold War with my hair, beating it back every few weeks, whenever I catch it in another hair-raising uprising.

My weapon of choice is a set of electric clippers. I stopped going to the barber years ago because my hair is just not worth it. I could either take an hour or more to drive somewhere, sit and wait for my turn, chit-chat with the chopper about nothing I care about, and then drive home, having given my hair far more of my time than it is worth. Or I could take the clippers to it like so many guillotines punishing the tiny prisoners; at once quicker, more effective, and more satisfying. It’s not just about taming the mess; it’s about teaching the hair a lesson. Over and over.

When I am King, we’ll all be bald, or at least I will be. Wear a wig if you want, but this constant hair-paring is time-consuming and annoying. My hair cuts don’t make me look better, they just prevent me from looking even worse. Why bother? Maybe this is what balding is about as we get older; by the time it starts falling out you’re just glad to see it go.

Besides: I won't need hair when I’ve got a crown.

Before:

After:

1/02/2013

When I am King: Second Edition



I have some great news: the second edition of When I am King... II is now available on Amazon, as shown by this snapshot of the previewed copyright page:


That's right - if you were holding off on purchasing it because you knew that there were probably dumb mistakes in the original version, or because you have some bizarre and debilitating allergy to first editions, then this is your lucky day. As is tomorrow, and the day after that, because I'm done. This is it. Finito.

Sure, I thought the first edition was also going to be the last edition of this book, but public outcry demanded otherwise.*

* Okay, okay, I found some errors. Lots of errors. Errors I couldn't live with, knowing that they were populating peoples' future bookshelves, besmirching the good name of me, my family, and the book, and fouling up any future chances I might have at the throne, assuming that the entrance exam includes spelling and grammar sections.
It's unbelievable, and incredibly depressing, how many times you can read your own writing and still miss glaring errors that are lying there like slugs crawling through your cinnamon bun.
And okay, there were some formatting issues too. I fixed those, too. Your You're welcome.


This outcome is wonderful news for everyone, of course:

Non-owners

If you hadn't bought the book yet, now you can get a More Perfect version of the book. Surely, this was the last holdup in spending that $6.95 on the hardcopy ($3.49 for the Kindle version). Now I've removed that roadblock and you can get on with your life and stop worrying about this critical issue.

First Edition Owners
First of all, congratulations on owning a now-classic and out-of-print First Edition! The latest edition has made the original edition a collectable, since there was such a limited run of these, and you are an owner of that rare printing! Wow!

Not only that, but you are one of a select few to be able to collect all editions of this now collectible series. Sure, the new buyers that only own the second edition may attempt to brag that they own a more "perfect" and more "grammatically correct" edition, but how great is that claim compared to owning copies of all versions of the series, each complete with their own distinctive characteristics?
Well done!

Meanwhile, I've updated the Kindle version as well, so anyone that purchased that electronic edition for the past few days has already accessed the perfection** that is the Second Edition.

** My lawyer has advised me to not use this word, given what happened with the first edition. But really, it's pretty good this time. I guarantee promise think.


12/09/2012

Depend on the Kindleness of Strangers

The Kindle version of When I am King... II: More Reasons to Put Me in Charge is now available on Amazon (the hardcopy version was already available).

In an odd twist, the Kindle version is apparently free ($0.00) for Amazon Prime members through the Kindle lending library. I don't quite get how this works, but apparently you can read it free through the library. Or you can buy it for $3.49. I, er, uh... maybe they make it up through volume?

Either way, you can get it for your Kindle now.

This eBook version is quite distinct from the hardcopy in several respects:
  • Unique table of contents, specifically tuned for this electronic edition (because Kindle couldn't cope with the hardcopy's table of contents. Apparently links to page numbers don't translate well. That was fun to fix)
  • Unique placement of graphics (because the conversion process completely messed with the nicely inlined pictures in the original Word version and everything had to be painfully tweaked, one by one. Holy hell, graphics are tough to deal with when going electronic. Next time, I think I'll stick with words.)
  • Fixes for minor glitches found during the publishing process (No matter how many times you edit your own stuff, you will *always* find more errors, especially after it's actually published. Grumble.)
Oh, and it's way cheaper, as eBooks should be, coming in at about half the price of the hardcopy.

Obligatory link to the eBook version. And, for completeness, a link to the original hardcopy WAIKII-classic version. You know, the book. The actual, printed thing. Made from trees, has pages.

eBook
hardcopy

12/08/2012

When I am King... II: The Book

It's out. It's here. It's the one you've been waiting for, even if you didn't know it.

It's the second, it's the sequel, it's the one that the first was published in anticipation of, even if it didn't know it.

It's published, it's on sale an Amazon, it's the reason that Amazon exists, even if it doesn't know it.

When I am King... II, the book. Available now from Amazon.

Get it for a gift. Get it for yourself. Get it for a coffee table coaster.

Buy one for your dog.
Buy one for your cat.
Buy a couple dozen for
A front door mat.

This new book is remarkably similar to the first When I am King... book, except for the part where it's all new content. Okay, okay, it contains King essays originally published on my blog, but none of them are in the first book. Because that'd be cheating, and dumb. It'd be like those bands that release Yet Another Greatest Hits album with most of the songs from the previous Greatest Hits on it again. Also, this second volume is bigger. And longer. And bigger. And I spent some quality time refining this one, adding a bit of content here and there, updating the material, and generally making the book look (if I do say so myself) pretty good.

The book will also be available in a Kindle version, just as soon as I can push that through the process. Expect another self-serving blog post about that soon.

In the meantime, go get the hardcopy. Before Amazon runs out of books and the Amazon Rainforest runs out of trees.



11/21/2012

When I am King: Thanksgiving

When I am King...

There will be more honest holidays.

Thanksgiving is, to me, the holiday that is most quintessentially American. It is also the holiday that is truest to the original spirit of the event.

The honesty of the holiday is seen by examining other major holidays:

Christmas is, at least since the Christians took it over in hostile takeover bid, a time to celebrate the birth of Christ. So we kill each other in mobs at the store and spend ourselves deeply into debt to buy items we don’t need and don’t have room for, wrap them up in single-use paper that goes immediately thereafter into the landfill, put them under a fake (or recently killed) pine tree, and spend the holiday exchanging gifts. And we eat too much. I'm not seeing the connection here.

New Years is a day so confusing to most of us (celebrating the meta idea of the incrementing of the least significant digit of the number representing the year), that we end up binge drinking because we can’t figure out what else to do. And we eat too much.

Easter, another pagan celebration morphed into a Christian holiday, is about the re-birth of Christ. Because I guess the huge celebration at Christmas wasn’t enough for the guy? I’m not positive, but I think Christ is mostly famous for being the only person in history to get two birthday celebrations during the year. Maybe it’s because his main birthday is on Christmas, so his parents felt sorry for him. To celebrate this event, we find candy and hard-boiled eggs that were hidden by a mythical rabbit. And we eat too much.

Resurrection, rabbits, candy, eggs: I don’t get it. Maybe I’m not religious enough. I think the holiday marketing people were sniffing glue when they came up with this one.

The Fourth of July is also a very American holiday, celebrating our independence from that government that taxed us so that we could tax ourselves instead. So we celebrate it with fireworks. And we eat and drink too much at picnics. The connection between independence and blowing stuff up at picnics seems a tad tenuous. Maybe it’s because the original celebrations of people standing around waiting to sign a document weren’t quite riveting enough.

Halloween is one that I think nobody understands. There’s something about scary things, which devolves into going to strangers’ houses begging for candy. After which we eat too much of it. Again, the original idea somehow got lost in the current celebration.
Thanksgiving, on the other hand, is true to its roots, and 100% American. The original event was the celebratory meal between the Pilgrims and the Native Americans, a relaxing time of togetherness and good cheer, right before the invaders spent the next 300 years taking forcing them off their land. The current holiday celebration is similarly about gathering with friends and family and eating. The purpose and the celebration are exactly the same thing, minus the bit about taking their land (because that part’s done).

Meanwhile, the holiday is all-American. Not only does it commemorate the event several hundred years ago that happened on American soil, but, more importantly, we get to eat and drink too much, which is just about as American as you can get.

When I am King, more holidays will be true to their roots. But rather than create a bunch of celebrations that tie directly into events in tedious ways (do you really want to spend Flag Day waving a flag around?), we will create new holidays that are based around food and drink. For example, we could create a day in honor of the hot dog eating contest winner, on which we all gorge ourselves on hot dogs all day. Another holiday might celebrate the establishment of college fraternities, which everyone would remember (and then forget) by drinking too much.

We won’t stop until the holiday calendar is full, and the people are too.

(Aside: Here's a Thanksgiving poem for you: http://chetchat.blogspot.com/2012/11/thanksgiving-is-here-ode-to-gluttony.html)

11/19/2012

When I am King: Chet Lag

When I am King...

There will be no more jet lag.

Where is it written that we have to suffer jet lag on the return trip, when we never successfully adjusted to the current time on the other end of the trip?

Here's how my international trips usually go:

First, I always take a red-eye, because, well, it’s just so damn fun missing a night’s sleep. I am never able to sleep on this long flight because, for some odd reason, I find it impossible to sleep in a room with 300 strangers. It's like the world's biggest youth hostel, except with a less comfortable bed and people that are much older and crankier. I do attempt sleep, which usually includes having several glasses of whatever booze they're serving. This tends to make me tired, but never enough to actually sleep. Instead, it just serves to make me both drunk and hungover in time for breakfast.

I land in the morning and spend the day wandering around my destination city in a daze, wanting to nap but knowing that it'll just screw with my internal clock even more. So I stumble around through the day, trying not to get run over or mugged, until I can finally topple into bed, at which point I actually get a solid night's sleep, wake up feeling good, and assume that I must be adjusted to the new time zone.

What an idiot. Every time I travel I have this same experience, and every time I fall for it.

The next night, I once again fall into bed completely exhausted at some reasonably early time and proceed to lie there for something like 47 hours with nary a wink of sleep until one minute before my alarm goes off and it's time to start the day.

This routine continues off and on for the next few nights, where I get roughly two hours of sleep per night. Finally, by the end of a week, I manage to get one normal night of sleep and assume, again, that I have finally adjusted.

What an idiot.

The night before I return, my body goes into travel mode and I'm back to two hours of sleep that night.

I then board a plane that flies back home, during which I once again fail to get any sleep, although I do consume enough alcohol after the airplane breakfast to be drunk by lunchtime and hungover by the time we land.

I stumble home in a haze, buzzing with fatigue and glad to be back in the time zone that my body refused to leave, and eventually fall into bed that night and catch a decent night's sleep, at which point I declare myself done with jet lag.

What an idiot.

The second night home, I crumble into bed in the evening only to have my eyes pop open four hours later, ready to go because my body has decided that it really does want to be in that other time zone, after all.

So I spend the next week at home re-adjusting to the time zone that I never seem to have left until I got home. Meanwhile, I have more waking time than I usually do, since I'm up for most of every night and unable to take naps during the day. This could be a very productive time for me, except for the part where my brains feel like they've just finished an encounter with zombies. So it's all I can do to remember my password and log onto my computer to listlessly browse the web and social network sites looking for mind-numbing content to get me through each day.

When I am King, there will be no more jet lag because the entire world will share a single time zone. No longer will we have to adjust to different times because we will all share the same clock. If you fly for twelve hours, it'll be twelve hours later when you arrive, which seems pretty reasonable to me.

Of course, this could cause problems with the mismatch between daylight and time. We’re still working on that part. I believe it’s solvable, but my mind is so fuzzed by jetlag that I can’t really think through it right now.

11/02/2012

When I am King: Stop Stop Signs

When I am King...

There will be no more four-way stops.

You know the scenario: you pull up to the intersection, see there’s a stop sign, and come to a stop. You see cars coming from the other directions, so you wait for them to pass. But they slow down and stop instead. At this point, you realize that it’s a four-way stop sign, and that you were there before them, so it must be your turn. But by the time you start to pull out, these other cars have decided that you took too long, so they’ve started to pull out. You stop to avoid hitting them, by which time they’ve seen you start to pull out, so they stop. You wave them to go ahead, they wave at you, then you both start again, and both stop again. Meanwhile, more cars have come from all directions, including cars behind you, and they’re all waiting for you to get your little start/stop shuffle over with so that they can begin their own turn.

Four-way stops suck. They’re dependent on drivers that: (a) are polite and wait in turn for others to go and (b) remember when everyone got there. The first of these is obviously ridiculous. The second is patently impossible. I have a hard enough time remember when I arrived; now I’m supposed to figure out when everyone else got there as well?

If it were only four directions, it might be possible to do this. But usually such an intersection has as many as two to three lanes in each direction. the one nearest my house has four lanes going north, and four going south and two lanes each going east/west. That’s a total of twelve cars at any one time that I have to keep track of. More to the point, there are eleven other drivers that I have to trust also knowing the order in which everyone got there. Then you throw a pedestrian into the mix sauntering along the crosswalk, and all hell breaks loose and it’s as much as you can do not to run them over in spite.

We’ve got enough to deal with in our driving lives: high gas prices, road rage to keep in check, traffic to contend with, and other drivers to unfairly cut off so that we can arrive at work one car length earlier. Do we really need to add these multi-way stop hassles to it?

The response from some people when seeing this mess is that these intersections should be replaced by roundabouts. I’ve seen these work in England with great effectiveness, as cars go speeding into and out of the circle by achieving terminal velocity in the gravitational field of the roundabout. It looks like great fun and seems effective at keeping the traffic moving. The Arc de Triomphe roundabout in Paris also seems to work, although it seems more like a method to cut down on the driving population. But if you’ve ever seen one of these attempted in the U.S., you’ll know that it’s never going to work here. No matter what signage is there, nobody can ever figure out when they’re supposed to go, so either they wait forever until they think the coast is clear, or they just decide they have the right of way and go bombing into the intersection regardless of who was there already. I saw one of these installed in South Carolina a couple of years ago and some of the first cars to reach it are still waiting to enter the circle.

When I am King, there will be a technological solution to the problem. Just as traffic lights allow everyone to proceed safely even as they make people feel better about cheating the system by speeding through the yelllow-red, the new four-way stops will be both effective and and fair. In a world where tiny phones can correctly interpret sentences to return search results, it surely lies within our grasp to have the intersections themselves detect who got there first. Signals at the intersection will indicate which car should go first at any given time. If, as in a traditional 4-way stop, other cars try to race into the intersection first, a trap door will open up under those vehicles, removing the cars and their drivers from the intersection and from future intersection disagreements.

Clearly, this problem has to stop.

10/05/2012

When I am King: Fightin' Words

When I am King...

Candidates will just fight it out.

Presidential debates are an odd and obsolete phenomenon of our culture. Theoretically, we expect candidates to get up on stage and battle each other with their wits, knowledge, and ability to post a zinger, so that we can decide who has a better plan, and who would make a better leader, and who has a nicer suit.

But in reality, it’s just cheap voyeurism. The two remaining undecided voters in the country may want to tune in to see if they learn something new, but if they haven’t made up their mind by now, what are the chances that a debate is really going to help sort it out for them? That’s like drinking a second case of beer just to see if it also makes you throw up.

No, the real reason we do this is to see a fight. This is a culture that thrives on watching damage. We are a people that puts ourselves and our loved ones in danger by slowing down in the fast lane just to get a better glimpse of a bloody accident on the other side of the highway. We watch car races just to see the carnage (I honestly can’t imagine any other reason to watch people drive in circles for hours and hours). We watch daytime talk shows just to see if the jilted lover’s going to throw a chair at her brother-husband. We have an entire professional class whose job it is to fight for us in the courtroom while we sit on the sidelines and watch them duke it out with the other side’s highly-paid pinch-hitter.

Our culture was founded on fighting. In the beginning, Eve made Adam eat more fiber, bringing down the wrath of God upon them (Fight! Fight! Fight!) and causing the Original Argument which must have lasted through their entire, bickering marriage. Countries were formed by wars, kingdoms by murder, and governments by the side with the scariest army.

But we’ve evolved since those early days; now we have television and the internet that allows us to simply watch fights instead of having to participate in them. We’ve matured from a childish society that fights into a refined society that watches fights. Because, when it comes down to it, fighting is tiring, messy, and painful; it turns out to be much more enjoyable to watch others pound each other stupid while we have more beer and popcorn.

In political debates (a subject which I’m struggling to get back to, having gotten all excited about the topic of fighting), we each have the person we’re rooting for, and we want to see them slug it out and come out on top. We watch the debate through squinting eyes, afraid for the moments when the other person lands choice blows, and then diving onto the news sites before, during, and after to see whether we won the fight.

But this is all so indirect - why have the candidates dress up in suits and use words, prepared statements, and reams of facts and what we really want is blood on the mat?

When I am King, debates will be determined the way politics was intended; with fists, knees, and underhanded tactics. Let’s see some action, some pain, and some physical glory. Sure, winning such a contest has nothing to do with whether the champion would be a good leader for our nation. But since when have politicians ever been qualified for that role?

Besides, when I am King, they won’t be vying for the top spot, as that position will be taken. By me. So bring on the fisticuffs. I’ll sell beer and popcorn.

8/26/2012

When I am King: The Rating Game

When I am King...

Movie ratings will be clearer.




Warning: This blog has been rated by the Malicious Blogger Association of America (MBAA):









I've always found movie ratings so helpful. They take two hours of complex content and boil it down into a single letter that tells me exactly how appropriate it is for my children. Were the rating any more involved, or any closer linked to the actual material in the movie, then I would have to read and think about it to decide what to do. But the fact that it's such a simplistic measure of the maturity level needed to enjoy the film means that I can quickly ignore it.

Rating are not about providing real information. They're about making us feel just slightly guiltier about things we're going to do anyway.

I was particularly pleased with the rating of The King's Speech, which I saw when it came out in 2010. It was a serious film, well executed, that provided that perfect mix of drama, history, education, and entertainment. It was a film that I enjoyed for myself, and enjoyed taking the kids to as a cultural and historical lesson. Or at least I would have, except that the film was rated R.

I had to watch the film again to determine why it got this adult rating, checking the several obvious categories:
  • Nudity: This was Englad in the early 20th century. All of the characters were at least 5 layers of clothing away from naked.
  • Violence: True, the climactic speech was on the eve of a horrific war. But they only showed the speech itself, not the fighting. No blood, no shooting, no punches. Not even a hearty backslap.
  • Swearing: Oooooh, that's right. He drops the F-bomb a handful of times.
So it turns out that I'm advised to not take my kids to this excellent movie because they might hear a bad word. My kids hear worse language in my house when I stub my toe; what possible reason would I have for sheltering them from it in the movie theater? More significantly, how can the rating agency possibly put that kind of language on the same footing as, say, the gruesome death scenes or graphic sex acts in other R films?

When I am King, ratings will be more meaningful. Instead of obscure references like "inappropriate language" and "adult situations", the ratings will have concrete information about why the film got this rating, to help the responsible parent make the right decision. Or at least to make the wrong decision for the right reasons.

Here are some example ratings for existing films:


Space Buddies: A film that I was subjected to because of my youngest kid's abject love for anything related to dogs:


Star Trek: The Motion Picture: This film was pretty darn exciting when it came out, because it was the first Star Trek thing to come out since the original "5 year mission" was killed in its third season. But it only got a G rating, which is pretty a-typical for action movies. In hindsight, a better rating description would give some helpful information to the unwary moviegoer:



I enjoyed watching Airplane! with the kids last year. The hairstyles are totally dated, but the comedy still works. But some parents might want to know why Parental Guidance is avised:



The Hunger Games is an interesting series of books, now movies, delving into the loving and under-served genre of child genocide. Here is a more helpful rating:



We watched The Blues Brothers again recently, and were curious about the rating. Blues songs can be racy, but not quite enough to get an R rating, or so we thought. Maybe a more descriptive rating would have helped:



And finally, here's a more accurate rating for The King's Speech:



Maybe when I am King, I'll even make a speech about it. And I'll throw in a few bad words, just to get a juicy rating.

7/27/2012

When I am King: Lost and Found

When I am King...

Campers will always bring truly essential items.

I had the pleasure of staying for a week at a boy scout camp last week. Anyone that knows me will be surprised to learn that I didn’t die, either from ineptitude or unhappiness-inspired suicide. As a matter of fact, I managed to enjoy the experience. Once you get beyond the various elements of camping, such as the food quality, sleeping in the cold, the bats nesting right outside the open window, the lack of strong coffee to defend against fatigue, the paucity of booze, the incessant hiking up and down camp for every errand, and the feeling of being Pigpen, trailing a thick cloud of dust behind you everywhere you go, it turns out to be fun simply hanging out at camp. Maybe it was the books I read, or the camp activities I participated in, or the rambling conversation with the boys and adults in the camp. Or perhaps, just perhaps, it was the complete lack of responsibilities for a week, a first in my life since the week after college finals finished and before the hangover wore off.

It was in this spirit of "camp is fun!" that I mistakenly went for a hike in the woods. It was a mistake not because of the hike itself, or because of the woods, but because of the part where I got lost in the woods. I had a map with me, of course; it would be silly to go hiking in the wilderness without a map. But the map was about as useful to me as a recipe for borscht; once I got past the recognizable sites on the map ("shotgun range", "rifle range", "mountain man"), it ceased to work. I looked for signs which were obvious on the map: trails leading off to the right, forks in the road, bends in the path; none of them appeared. The map must have been drawn by someone that got tired of their job and simply imagined the rest of it. It was like the maps from the Old Country, showing European countries in great and accurate detail, then an expanse of ocean to the west, followed by sea monsters. They didn't quite know what was out there, nor how far that something was, but they were pretty sure it'd eat you. In my case, someone took an educated guess that there'd be a path, and probably some other paths off that, and that maybe it'd circle back to camp eventually. So that's what they drew.

I'm accustomed to tools not working properly and generally know how to fix it, but in this case the map had no reboot switch. Paper is soooo 1800's.

I blissfully followed the trail into the woods for 10 minutes. Then 20 minutes, seeing no other turns. Then 30 minutes, with the trail leading me farther and farther from camp and everything I'd ever known. I began to have a feeling that I might do better by turning around. Finally, at 40 minutes that decision was made for me as the trail simply ended in some random brush at the top of a rise. I turned around and made my way back.

At this point, I realized that it was going to get dark soon, and while the trail led me faithfully away from civilization, I had no idea whether it would conveniently lead me in reverse back to civilization. I thought it more likely that I was caught in a trap, like the crab traps I used in Chesapeake Bay when I was a kid - the crabs found the entrance much easier to use than the exit. I could almost smell the cocktail sauce.

I took stock of my possessions. I was on a trip with the scouts, so of course I knew about the Ten Essentials. These are the items that no boy scout should be without (even, apparently, when going through security at an airport, which explains why TSA detained us due to the three pocketknives in my son's backpack). As I didn't have a backpack on me, my stock-taking was pretty quick:

  • Map? yes, although all it had done so far was get me lost
  • Compass? no
  • Sunscreen and sunglasses? no
  • Food? no
  • Water? no
  • Extra clothes? no
  • Flashlight? no
  • First aid kit? no
  • Firestarter? no
  • Pocketknife? no


It turns out that the only essential item I had was the broken map. Unless I could make something useful out of shoelaces and a belt buckle, it looked like I was doomed. I might as well have written "Bear food" on my forehead and gotten it over with (though I also lacked a pen with which to write).


Having generated an appropriate amount of anxiety, I took the appropriate action: I ran back the way I had come.

Fortunately, to make a long story only slightly longer, the trail, in a surprisingly un-crab-trap-like manner, did work in reverse, and I ended up where I started from. I passed "Shotgun range", "Archery", and several campsites on my way to the dining hall, where everyone was happily digging into dinner, having noticed my absence not at all. It was a relief to know that I could have been lost, mauled, eaten, and digested long before it came to anyone's attention.

I spent the rest of the time at camp studiously not hiking. I did many activities for the rest of the week, but hiking was not among them. And getting lost was similarly not on the list.

It is in the spirit of this hike, and of camp in general, that I offer my list of essential items. These are the things that I will take on any future camping trips, and I suggest that if you want to enjoy the experience, you do the same.
  1. Chair: It turns out that what you mostly do at camp is sit around. Through extensive research and experimentation, I found that a chair is much more comfortable for this activity than a log, or the dirt. An ottoman is optional.
  2. Hot sauce: Camp food is filling and edible, b it is not tasty. Take hot sauce to either add flavor where it is lacking, or disguise flavor where it is not.
  3. Earplugs: One of the great joys of camping outdoors is the ability to listen to your fellow campers. All night long. Don't make the nights longer and more sleepless than they need to be. Shut them out.
  4. Books: As with the chair (see #1, above), books are instrumental in passing the long hours sitting around in camp. Without books, you might be forced to actually do things like enjoy your natural surroundings.
  5. Warm sleeping bag: One item that scouts are encouraged to have is an "emergency blanket," which is basically a large piece of tinfoil. While this might help retain heat, it cannot bring the same level of comfort as a good, warm sleeping bag. More importantly, a sleeping back will be more helpful when the bears come: a camper rolled up in a polyester bag looks like a packaging nightmare to a hungry bear, whereas the camper rolled in an emergency blanket simply looks like a to-go bag of Jiffy Pop.
  6. Thick mattress: Sleeping in nature generally involves lying on root- and rock-infested ground. Chances are your body is not going to appreciate the experience. It's one thing to look at a beautiful grove of trees; it's quite another to try to sleep there. Save yourself sleepless nights and bring a camping mattress. Some mattresses are optimized for backpacking, providing a small amount depth and width. These items are useful for minimizing weight and bulk in a long hike, but let's be honest; are you really going to be backpacking any further than the walk from the car to the campground? Do your body a favor; bring a mattress at least a foot thick.
  7. Lighter fluid: When you want a fire, you want it now. Why futz around with proper kindling and firewood stacking? Al you need is a half gallon jug of lighter fluid. Take the cap off, stack the wood around it, stick a piece of newspaper into the jug and light it. Ba-da-Boom.
  8. Pen and paper: You probably won't get around to writing deep thoughts as much as you thought you might. But should you find yourself on a hike, you might want a way to write down your last will and testament, for the bears and mountain lions to read with their meal.
  9. Smartphone: You won't be able to get a signal, but phones aren't really for making calls anymore, are they? Instead, you'll be able to play some games to while away the idle hours in camp (see #'s 1 and 4, above).
  10. Coffee: A long time ago (around six thousand years, according to religious nuts), man came down from the trees and started walking around this earth. Meanwhile, some apes stayed in the trees, continuing to swing around and throw poop for fun. Meanwhile, the descenders came down to Make Things Happen. The only difference between these groups is that the descenders knew how to make coffee. Don't fool yourself into thinking you can go without for a few days; there's no need to suffer, and you might find yourself swinging in the trees instead. Do yourself a favor; bring coffee and figure out a way to make it in camp: boil water on the camp stove, buy ones of those fancy french-press gadgets at the camping store, or just snort it.

To make this list even more useful, I'll add an eleventh item, probably the most important one:
  1. Never go hiking into the wilderness.
With these essentials, I feel confident that people forced to spend time in nature will be able to get through the experience more comfortable, happy, and alive than they would otherwise. Another option to consider is simply staying home. There's a reason that we all came down from the trees, and it wasn't so that we could sleep on the roots.

6/01/2012

When I am King: Space Exploration

When I am King...

Everything will have its place.

I used to believe the common misconception that death-by-old-age happened because various medical problems simply add up over time and overwhelm the body.

I know now that this is wrong. Death, instead, comes not from the body, but from the mind - it’s confused and overpowered by this constant, nagging question: where do we put all of this stuff we have? Eventually, it simply gives up and checks out, because there is no good answer.

The longer we live, the more we accumulate: hand-me-downs, purchases, gifts, 2-for-1 deals, important mail that we should hang onto for some unspecified time. With each new thing comes the associated items that we have to find a place for: the old thing that it replaces, the manual and associated paperwork that came with the new thing, and the cords and extra parts which the new thing will need only after we throw them out (so we keep them forever, stashed in places that we will never find again).

And then there are the boxes, tons and tons of boxes. These things always come with boxes that are perfectly tuned to the size and odd shape of the new thing. And we know that we may need to pack the thing up and return it, so we’d better keep the boxes. Forget the fact that we’ve never returned anything we bought by mail before; there’s always a first time, and it will come only after we’ve chucked the box and have no way to pack the item up.

So we hang onto this stuff and have to figure out where to put it. We put the extra, obsolete version of the thing in the bedroom. Or the bathroom. Or the kids’ rooms. But soon we run out of those options. Some people have more kids just for this reason, but are then faced with the problem of where to put all of the children.

We put the cords and extra parts in indistinct piles of other cords and parts in places that we can never find again. When we do stumble upon these random objects, we cannot remember what objects the parts go with, which explains why we always have hundreds of power adapters spread throughout the house, but can never locate the one we need for the gadget that needs it.

We put the boxes in the attic. Or the basement. Or, lacking these spaces as we do in California, we put them in the garage, or the corners of rooms, or pretend that they're extra bedrooms for the smaller kids, or anywhere we can find space.

We always attempt to play the Russian doll game with the boxes, placing smaller ones inside other, but find that somehow the boxes are never proportionally sized. There is a Theorem of Box Collections that states that for any two boxes A and B, exactly two of the dimensions of A must be greater than those of B. So any box that fits inside another must, therefore, stick out the top. There is a related Theorem of Expanding Packing Pieces that states that the form-fitting styrofoam modules that come with a box take up more volume when the packed item is removed than they did originally, guaranteeing that the Theorem of Box Collections is moot, since there’s no room inside the box for air, much less another box.

Soon the storage spaces of our living areas are filled with these smaller, cardboard storage spaces. So we have nothing but space in these rooms, but they are filled to capacity and we cannot fit any more.

Meanwhile, our families are having storage problems of their own - parents downsize houses or go on regular purges of your childhood memories. But rather than actually get rid of things they cannot part with, they ship it to you. And since it was a gift, a family heirloom even, you get to figure out where to put it. And the box it came in.

The problem only gets worse as we get older because we just keep getting more stuff. And the stuff keeps getting more complicated. I bought a stereo component 20 years ago that came with a box. That’s it - just a box. I bought another to replace it recently that came with a manual, a DVD with the manual, wires for all possible combinations of audio and video input and output I might possibly need (assuming I was building a professional broadcasting station), a remote, stickers, labels, boxes inside boxes, and carefully contoured styrofoam packing modules. Where do I put all of this stuff?

This is the largest problem weighing upon the mind of the aging, increasingly the older and more laden-down they get. Eventually, the mind simply gives up and the body takes it from there.

When I am King, we will explore space. That is, we will explore the galaxy, looking for more space. This will not be for the traditional, ridiculous purpose of expanding human knowledge, or achieving scientific goals, or boldly going where no one has gone before - it will just be to find more space to put stuff. It will be a mission to find a really large closet.

Obviously, the stuff that we put there will not be very accessible. But the reality is that we never actually need these things - these boxes, components, and hand-me-downs never get used, or even looked-at again. Instead, we just keep them for our own peace of mind, so that we know that if we do need them, they still exist somewhere.

Once we have solved this problem, people will be happier and more relaxed and everyone will live much, much longer.

Then we just have to figure out where to put all of the people.

5/04/2012

When I am King: The F*ckit List

When I am King...

Everyone will have a f*ckit list.

As people are studiously trying to compose their Bucket Lists, I’m working on my own version: the F*ckit List.

The Bucket List (and yes, that token Wikipedia link sends you to a page about the movie, because Wikipedia has the good sense to not grace the bucket list trend with an entry) is the latest fad of mortality, where we’re supposed to think about, and theoretically do, all of the things that we want to do before we escape this mortal incarceration. Kilamanjaro, Everest, getting a date: all of our impossible dreams that we really could accomplish with enough focus, drive, and roofies.

But honestly - do you really want to climb Everest? Or is it just that you feel bad you haven’t done anything exciting in your life? I mean, I’m sure the view is lovely, if you can see past the blinding blizzard and stand the freezing sheets of falling ice long enough to gaze out on the valleys below. But do you really want to suffer the journey up there? Why? To say that you’ve done it? Just say you haven’t done it - it’s much easier, more relaxing, and more honest. Because really, would you ever make it anyway? With all of your fingers and toes?

The bucket list, to me, is a list of regrets that will fester in your head, nestled amongst the lunatic ravings of your final days. Sure, you might get to do some of them. But you’ll probably discover that doing so was a complete hassle (see my earlier treatise on Everest). And maybe they required too much sacrifice along the way. Sure, traveling with that rock band was an experience, but was it worth coming home to a house devoid of your spouse and all of your belongings?

There are plenty of things that I won’t be able to do in this life, but I’d rather have them be a mystery than itemize them in TODO notes that weigh heavily upon the paper and the mind. I’d prefer to be pleasantly surprised when I actually do anything that isn’t completely mundane than to aim for, and vastly undershoot, high goals of adventure and excitement.

But I’ll take this further: I think that instead of listing the things that we want to do, we should list the things that we’re going to be okay with not doing. This is a list we can accomplish.

When I am King, everyone will have a F*ckit List. This is a list of all of the things that could be exciting to do but... nahhhhh. They’re just not going to happen, and that’s alright.

I’ll give some examples to help you get yours going:

Mt. Everest, Kilimanjaro, and even that small hill 10 miles away: I’ve climbed hills before. It seems exciting from the base, but really it’s just an exhausting and forgettable way of changing altitude. Only the process of taking a flight, with the lines, X-Ray frisking, and crammed-stuffy-elevator environment is worse, but at least in an airplane you get to go way, way up. Do you really see yourself spending days, weeks, or even hours raising yourself just marginally higher than you are now?
F*ckit.

Timbuktu: This city, and others like it, sound very exotic and make you think that you should see it. But when you get there, you realize that it’s just another city with people, traffic, buildings, and probably a complete lack of the coffee shops you frequent. In the end, it’s really about the sound of the city name: Tim-Buk-Tu. It’s just a great combination of consonants. So say it a few times to yourself and move on.
F*ckit.

Dating supermodels: These people look really great on the page, apart from the staples in the middle. But do you really want to spend your time with someone that focuses so much on looking that good? Eventually you’ll get around to having a conversation and the passion will just die.
Besides, my wife would kill me.
F*ckit. (not them)

Playing major league sports: Really? You’ve gained 50 pounds of pure bratwurst since that near-winning season your junior year of high school and you think you can go up against these folks that have trained their whole lives to be the shallow, money-making machines they are? Have another beer and turn on the game.
F*ckit.

Read the Great Books: This one’s easy. Pick up just one of the books. No, not the Jane Austen or the Cervantes; these are humorous fiction and go down pretty well when you’re in the mood. No, I’m talking about Plutarch, or Aristotle. Pick it up and read a page. Just a page. Now, you think you want to spend the next several years reading the rest of that book, much less several others a lot like it?
Maybe try watching a PBS series instead. Or something on the History channel. Or just call it a day and watch Die Hard. Again.
F*ckit.

Write a Book: Vastly overrated.
F*ckit.

In the end, our lives are about our experiences. Do you really want yours to include taking notes on things you regret not having done yet and probably continuing to not do in the future? Listing goals and accomplishments seems too much like work to me. Try life instead.
F*ckit.